NBL Proposes 3-Point Dunks, 4-Point Mid-Court Shots
The Australian men's professional basketball league seeks to shake up traditional rules with new scoring system, pending Fiba approval

The National Basketball League (NBL) in Australia has proposed a series of rule changes to increase interest in the game, including rewarding dunks with three points instead of two and mid-court shots with four points. The proposal, which has been referred to the international governing body Fiba for approval, aims to bring more excitement to the game.
One of the proposed rule changes is to reward dunks with three points, instead of the traditional two points. This change is likely to encourage more teams to attempt dunks, which are already a high-probability shot. In fact, the rate of dunking in the NBA has increased to around 6% of shots attempted in recent years.
Another proposed rule change is to reward mid-court shots, known as the 'logo three', with four points. This change is likely to encourage more teams to attempt shots from beyond the three-point line, which could lead to more exciting and unpredictable gameplay.
The NBL had planned to trial the rule changes at the NBL Blitz tournament in Bendigo, but the timeline proved too tight. The league remains keen to pursue the test in the future, which would provide valuable data on the impact of the rule changes.
The rise of three-pointers has been a defining feature of modern basketball, with around 40% of shots in the NBA now coming from beyond the arc. However, not everyone is a fan of this trend, and debate has erupted over the best version of the game. NBA commissioner Adam Silver has expressed a desire to address the rise of three-pointers without making 'kneejerk' changes, such as moving the three-point line back.
## Why it matters The proposed rule changes have significant implications for the future of basketball. If approved, they could lead to a more exciting and dynamic game, with more emphasis on athleticism and skill. However, they could also fundamentally alter the balance of the game, potentially leading to unintended consequences. As the NBL and Fiba consider the proposal, they will need to weigh the potential benefits against the potential risks and ensure that any changes are in the best interests of the game.
The outcome of the proposal is still uncertain, but one thing is clear: the NBL is committed to innovation and experimentation. Whether or not the proposed rule changes are approved, the league's willingness to think outside the box and try new things is likely to have a lasting impact on the game of basketball.





