Chris Brown Seeks New Trial Over $12.9M Judgment

Chris Brown is seeking a new trial in a $12.9 million judgment against him, claiming that the jury's decision was influenced by testimony about his 2009 assault on Rihanna. The judgment was awarded to his former housekeeper, Maria Avila, who sued Brown after being attacked by a dog at his Los Angeles-area home.

The lawsuit was filed by Maria Avila after she was attacked by a dog at Chris Brown's home, resulting in severe injuries. Chris Brown had asked the court to ban testimony about his 2009 felony domestic violence conviction for assaulting Rihanna, arguing that it was prejudicial and lacked any connection to the case.

Despite his argument, the judge allowed the testimony, and Chris Brown is now arguing that it influenced the jury's decision. He accepted some liability for the incident but said Maria Avila was partially at fault, testifying during the trial that he had warned her not to go outside unaccompanied because of the unfriendly dog.

The incident that led to the lawsuit occurred six years before the trial, and Chris Brown's lawyers filed a motion on August 10 asking to wipe the trial verdict. The verdict was won by Maria Avila in June, and Chris Brown is seeking a new trial, arguing that the jury's decision was influenced by improper evidence.

## Why it matters The case highlights the potential impact of prior convictions on current legal proceedings. Chris Brown's lawyers argue that the testimony about his assault on Rihanna was prejudicial and influenced the jury's decision, leading to an 'excessive' verdict. The outcome of the case could have implications for how prior convictions are used in future legal proceedings.

The judge has yet to rule on Chris Brown's motion for a new trial. If the motion is granted, the case could be retried, potentially leading to a different outcome. If the motion is denied, Chris Brown may be required to pay the $12.9 million judgment to Maria Avila.