63% of UK Adults Trust Scientists, But Polarization Runs Deep

A recent study in the UK has found that while 63% of respondents indicate high trust in scientists, this trust is heavily influenced by values, identity, and politics. The survey, which polled 4,262 UK adults, identified significant divisions along political lines, with only 32% of Reform UK supporters feeling that scientists are on their side, compared to 71% of Green supporters.

The study, led by the Policy Institute at King's College London and Sense About Science, and funded by Wellcome, found that knowing a scientist personally is linked to greater trust in scientists, regardless of occupational or educational levels. However, the perceived shared values between scientists and the public play a crucial role in shaping trust, with only 7% of people who have low trust in scientists believing that scientists are on their side.

The research highlights a stark contrast in trust levels between different political groups, with a 39-point gap between Reform UK and Green supporters. This polarization is reminiscent of the divisions over science that have emerged in the US, and raises concerns about the potential impact on public perception of science.

## Why it matters The study's findings have significant implications for the way science is perceived and communicated to the public. The fact that trust in scientists is closely tied to values, identity, and politics suggests that scientists and science communicators need to take a more nuanced approach to engaging with different audiences. By understanding the factors that drive trust, scientists and policymakers can work to increase trust and promote a more informed public debate about science.

The study's results also underscore the importance of personal connections in building trust. With only 22% of people who score in the middle on trust in scientists thinking that scientists are on their side, there is a clear need for scientists to engage more directly with the public and build relationships based on shared values and interests.

## What happens next The study's findings provide a foundation for future research and policy initiatives aimed at promoting trust in science. By identifying the key drivers of trust and understanding the factors that contribute to polarization, scientists, policymakers, and science communicators can develop more effective strategies for engaging with the public and promoting a more informed and nuanced debate about science.